Criminal liability for banking crime perpetrators who make false records of customer deposits (decision study number: 2644/ Pid.B /2021/PN Mdn)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i9.666Keywords:
criminal liability, bank employees, false recordsAbstract
The security of customer funds in banks is often problematic due to the actions of bank employees themselves, where bank employees directly involved with customer funds commit acts of embezzlement in their positions by embezzling customer funds. The problem formulated in this study is as follows: What are the legal regulations regarding Banking Crimes that make false records of Customer Deposit Funds according to the applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia? and What are the legal considerations of the Judge at the Medan District Court in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of the crime of false records Case Number: 2644 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Mdn? This study aims to discuss the criminal liability of perpetrators of false record crimes. The type of research used in this study uses normative legal research. The data collection techniques used are library research and field research. The data analysis conducted in this study was qualitative. The results of the study found that criminal liability for bank employees who commit the crime of false recording can be punished using the provisions of Article 49, paragraph (1) of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking. The provisions of Article 49 of the Banking Law contain legal certainty because this article has been specifically designed for the crime of false recording, and the provisions of the Article expressly regulate the prohibition of false recording and provide threats of criminal sanctions for violators. The results of the analysis of Decision Number: 2644 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Mdn concluded that the criminal sentence imposed on the Defendant by the Medan District Court was 5 (five) years in prison and a fine of IDR 10,000,000,000.00 (ten billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with charges for 4 (four) months. According to the author, this sentence contains the principle of law enforcement and is in accordance with the provisions of Article 49 of the Banking Law.
References
Ali, Z. (2010). Hukum Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Amanda, G. P. & Hermansyah, Adi (2020). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Pencatatan Transaksi Perbankan oleh Pegawai Bank (Suatu Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh). JIM Journal of Criminal Law, 4(3). https://jim.usk.ac.id/pidana/article/view/16753?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Budiyono. (2011). Peran Bank Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Journal Legal Dynamics General University Soedirman Purwokerto, 1(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.268
Fuady, M. (2018). Metode Riset Hukum: Pendekatan Teori dan Konsep. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Gonzalez-Vega, C. (1998). Do financial institutions have a role in assisting the poor? In S. W. Robinson (Ed.), Strategic issues in microfinance (pp. 16–?). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429436574-2/financial-institutions-role-assisting-poor-claudio-gonzalez-vega
Loayza, N., & Soto, R. (2002). The Sources of Economic Growth: An Overview. Research Papers in Economics, 6, 001–040. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chb:bcchsb:v06c01pp001-040
Marpaung, L. (2012). Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Profit, B. (2000). Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
Usman, R. (2001). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan di Indonesian. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusuf Gideon Silaban

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

