Reconstruction of the tax dispute resolution system to achieve legal justice in Indonesia

Authors

  • Hermansyah Hutagalung Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i11.979

Keywords:

Tax Disputes, Legal Reconstruction, Legal Justice, Tax Courts, Institutional Reform

Abstract

The tax dispute resolution system in Indonesia plays a strategic role in maintaining a balance between the interests of tax authorities and the rights of taxpayers as part of the principle of legal justice in a country governed by the rule of law. However, the current system still faces various problems, including overlapping authorities between the Directorate General of Taxes and the Tax Court, the institutional dependence of the Tax Court on the Ministry of Finance, and a lengthy settlement process that often causes legal uncertainty for taxpayers. This situation indicates the need to reconstruct the tax dispute resolution system to make it more independent, efficient, and oriented towards substantive justice. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute, conceptual, and comparative approach. The analysis is conducted on legal norms governing tax courts and dispute resolution practices in several comparative countries. The results show that the tax dispute resolution system in Indonesia does not fully reflect the principles of the rule of law and legal justice as mandated by Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution. Reconstruction is needed by strengthening the institutional position of the Tax Court under the Supreme Court, establishing an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism for tax disputes, simplifying the objection and appeal processes, and digitizing tax court administration. Through these measures, it is hoped that the tax dispute resolution system in Indonesia can better guarantee certainty, fairness and legal protection for all parties.

Author Biography

Hermansyah Hutagalung, Universitas Medan Area

Hermansyah Hutagalung is affiliated with Universitas Sumatera Utara

References

Afonso, António, João Tovar Jalles, and Ana Venâncio. “Structural Tax Reforms and Public Spending Efficiency.” Open Economies Review 32, no. 5 (2021): 1017–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09644-4

Anugrahdwi. Material, Fungsi Dan Kedudukan Hukum Pajak. April 5, 2023. https://pascasarjana.umsu.ac.id/material-fungsi-dan-kedudukan-hukum-pajak/

Asshiddiqqie, Dr Jimly. PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM TATA NEGARA JILID II. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Basri, Hasan, and Mohammad Muhibbin. “KEDUDUKAN PENGADILAN PAJAK DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan 6, no. 4 (2022): 1442–58. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v6i3.11365

Erwiningsih, Winahyu. “IMPLEMENTASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PAJAK PADA PENGADILAN PAJAK INDONESIA.” Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 248–62. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v6i2.1585

Pembinaan Organisasi, Administrasi, dan Keuangan Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Terbitnya Putusan Mk Nomor: 26/Puu-Xxi/2023 Terhadap Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang Merdeka. (2023). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 6058-6064. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1443

Ho, Thuy Tien, Xuan Hang Tran, and Quang Khai Nguyen. “Tax Revenue-Economic Growth Relationship and the Role of Trade Openness in Developing Countries.” Cogent Business & Management 10, no. 2 (2023): 2213959. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2213959

Kurdi & Mazjah, Ibnu. (2025). Pemisahan Kekuasaan Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan: Studi Atas Implementasi Trias Politica Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 3 (n.d.).

Locke, John. (1960). Two Treaties of Civil Government. London: J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd.

Monstesquieu. (1989). The Spirit of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Nasyira, Ania, Nurul Hidayah, Siti Aydina, Salma Amalia Amanda, and Zulfa Rusyda Fadiyah. “PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 26/PUU-XXI/2023 TERHADAP INDEPENDENSI PENGADILAN.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 7 No 12 (Desember 2024).

Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Paramitha, Amelia Ayu. “KEBERADAAN PERADILAN PAJAK DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG PENGADILAN PAJAK.” Universitas Brawijaya., 2008. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/109645

Rifandanu, Farel. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Terhadap Pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak.” Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 145–61. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v6i1.3270

Saputra, Tri Eka, and Rahmat Eko Prabowo. “Comparative Analysis of Public Perceptions of Tax Justice and Public Responses to Changes in the Tax System.” Advances in Taxation Research 3, no. 1 (2025): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.60079/atr.v3i1.424

Shimon, Shetreet and Christopher, Forsyth (2012). The Culture of Judicial Independence, Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges,. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Silalahi, Heriantonius, Nandi Maulana, Lenny Ana, and Budi Kurnia. “Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Legal Contributions of Tax Consultants and Tax Attorneys in Indonesia.” Ilomata International Journal of Tax & Accounting Volume 6, no. Issue 1 January 2025 (n.d.): No. 25-52.

Situmeang, Tomson. “REPOSISI PENGADILAN PAJAK MENURUT SISTEM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA.” Honeste Vivere 32, no. 2 (2022): 108–22. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v32i2.138

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG PENGADILAN PAJAK.

UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Willa, Wahyuni. “Kedudukan Hukum Pajak Di Indonesia.” www.Hukumonline.Com (Jakarta), February 24, 2022.

Wogan, SARKA Solomon. “The Role of Taxation in National Development From The Inception Of Fourth Republic In Nigeria.” Policy Studies, 2019.

Young, H.P. “Distributive Justice in Taxation.” Journal of Economic Theory 44, no. 2 (1988): 321–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(88)90007-5

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

Hutagalung, H. (2025). Reconstruction of the tax dispute resolution system to achieve legal justice in Indonesia. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(11), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i11.979
Abstract Views: 8 | File Views: 8