Local open government: Key issues in Contagem, Brazil

Syed Agung Afandi; Rizki Erdayani

doi:10.55942/pssj.v6i1.689

Authors

Syed Agung Afandi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Rizki Erdayani Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.689

Keywords:

Contagem, key issues, open government

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the key issues of open government in Contagem, Brazil, using a bibliometric analysis approach. Research data were collected from Google Scholar using Publish or Perish and analyzed with VOSviewer through co-occurrence techniques on keyword units with the full counting method. The findings revealed three major dimensions within the discourse: normative, policy, and local practice. The normative dimension underscores transparency and accountability in digital platforms. The policy dimension demonstrates the institutionalization of open government principles in urban planning and social programs. The local practice dimension reflects contextual adaptation by emphasizing inclusivity, sustainability, and smart governance. Moreover, the five core commitments of Contagem—digital participation through Decidim, the Integrity Plan, the establishment of CPRAC-C for administrative conflict resolution, a mobile application for georeferencing third-sector services, and the enhancement of the Transparency Portal—illustrate the city’s serious efforts to integrate OGP values at the local level. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including limited and uneven citizen engagement, fragmentation of participatory instruments, digital divides, and the risk of symbolic implementation of the law. This study concludes that Contagem represents both opportunities and constraints in the execution of local open government, underscoring the need to strengthen inclusiveness, operational integrity, and integration of participatory mechanisms. Reinforcing these aspects would not only consolidate Contagem’s position within Brazil, but also enable it to serve as a model for participatory and sustainable urban governance in Latin America.

Author Biographies

Syed Agung Afandi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Syed Agung Afandi is affiliated with Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Rizki Erdayani, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Rizki Erdayani is affiliated with Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

References

Aboalmaali, F. S., Daneshfard, K., & Pourezzat, A. A. (2020). A Pattern to Recognition of Triggering Element of Open Government Implementation in Iran’s Public Organizations (Case Study: Ministry of Interior). Journal of Public Administration, 12(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1645684

Afandi, S. A., Erdayani, R., & Afandi, M. (2024). Open Parliament: Study from Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 5(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101855

Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating Open Government Data Platform Ecosystems through Governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479

Criado, J. I., & Gil-García, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(1), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Gao, Y., Janssen, M., & Zhang, C. (2021). Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211009955

Gascó-Hernández, M. (2014). Open government: Opportunities and challenges for public governance. The Spanish Journal of Public Administration, 161(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.06.003

Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(12), 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 21(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150362

Gil-Garcia, R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. (2020). Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.09.001

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

Janssen, M., & Helbig, N. (2018). Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: Policy-makers be prepared! Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001

Khurshid, M. M., Zakaria, N. H., Arfeen, M., Rashid, A., Shehzad, S. U. N., & Faisal, H. M. (2022). Factors Influencing Citizens’ Intention to Use Open Government Data—A Case Study of Pakistan. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(31), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101698

Kulsum, U., Nurmandi, A., Isnaini, Muallidin, Jafar, M., Loilatu, & Kurniawan, D. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1419069

Lnenicka, M., & Saxena, S. (2021). Re-Defining Open Government Data Standards for Smart Cities’ Websites: A Case Study of Selected Cities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(4), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-12-2020-0174

Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533

Mendonça, R. F., & Maia, R. C. M. (2022). Digital platforms and democratic deliberation in Brazil: Lessons from local governments. Journal of Latin American Studies, 54(2), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Conceptualizing the Quality of Transparency. Politics & Society, 41(4), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130299

Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from Old Open Government to New Open Government: Four Critical Dimensions and Case Illustrations. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691024

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up-to-date Review. Multidisciplinar, 29(1), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005

Noushin, M. K., Farajollah, R., Mahdi, M., & Mahmoud, S. (2020). A Model for Measuring the Willingness of Policy Makers to Open Government in Iran. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 11(2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101491

Open Government Partnership. (2024). Contagem open government journey. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/contagem-open-government-journey

Peixoto, T., & Fox, J. (2016). When Does ICT-Enabled Citizen Voice Lead to Government Responsiveness? World Development, 79, 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.019

Piotrowski, S. J. (2017). Transparency and secrecy: A reader linking literature and contemporary debate. Lexington Books.

Prastya, D. E., Misran, & Nurmandi, A. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of E-Democracy On Government Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 20(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1840325

Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. J. (2020). The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101449

Safarov, I. (2019). Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1438296

Shao, D. D., & Saxena, S. (2019). Barriers to Open Government Data (OGD) Initiative in Tanzania: Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Growth and Change, 50(1), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133607

Wampler, B., Touchton, M., & Pereira, F. (2021). Participatory Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Brazil. World Development, 137(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105295

Wang, V., & Shepherd, D. (2020). Exploring the Extent of Openness of Open Government Data – A Critique of Open Government Datasets in the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 405-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101405

Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735

Wirtz, B., Weyerer, J., & Rösch, M. (2019). Open Government and Citizen Participation: An Empirical Analysis of Citizen Expectancy towards Open Government Data. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1419986

Zhao, Y., Liang, Y., Yao, C., & Han, X. (2022). Key Factors and Generation Mechanisms of Open Government Data Performance: A Mixed Methods Study in the Case of China. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 1717-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101630