Legal dualism of priority rights for tax debts by the state when taxpayers go bankrupt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i5.573Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Dualism, State’s Preferential Right, Taxpayer, Tax DebtAbstract
The existence of dual regulations governing the State's preferential right to tax debt repayment presents a distinct issue in resolving matters related to taxpayers who have been declared bankrupt by the court. The two domains of public law and civil law both regulate the privilege of priority in the repayment of debts by the debtor. Therefore, an in-depth analysis is necessary to address the issue of tax debt repayment when a taxpayer has been declared bankrupt. The objective of this study is to analyze and seek answers regarding the position of the state as a creditor in the repayment of tax debts, as well as to provide an analysis of the regulation concerning the State’s preferential right over tax debts. The research method used is a qualitative normative approach, utilizing secondary data and descriptive-analytical techniques for data analysis. The results of this study indicate that the state holds a higher position than other types of creditors as regulated in the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law (BSDPO Law), and therefore must be given priority. However, the two sets of regulations remain unreconciled in terms of harmonizing the position of creditors in fulfilling tax debt obligations. Moreover, the regulation regarding the repayment of tax debts mandates that such debts must be settled before the repayment of other types of debts owed by the debtor.
References
Candraningrum, T. B. (2022). Upaya Penagihan Utang Pajak Terhadap Wajib Pajak yang Telah diputus Pailit. Jurist-Diction, 5(2), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i2.34913
Hadi, S. (2007). Hukum Kepailitan. PT. Kencana.
Harahap, N. D. (2022). Hak Mendahulu Negara Atas Utang Pajak Untuk Wajib Pajak Dinyatakan Pailit Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan. Jurnal Ilmiah Kohesi, 6(3), 16–24.
Manurung, P. H. (2015). Hak Mendahului Tagihan Utang Pajak Untuk Wajib Pajak Yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Premise Law Journal, 11.
Mardiasmo. (2004). Perpajakan (Revisi). Andi.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Vol. 1). Mataram University Press .
Muhammad Adhiluhung Sosiawan. (2022). Eksistensi Hak Mendahului Negara Atas Hutang Pajak Debitor Dalam Proses Kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 1(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v1i3.36
Muhammad Djafar, S. (2011). Pembaruan Hukum Pajak. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Murniati, R. (2020). Gugurnya Hak Mendahului Negara Atas Piutang Pajak dalam Kepailitan Perusahaan. JATISWARA, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v35i3.265
Najib, M., Sari, E. K., & Magister, ). (2019). Kepastian Hukum Hak Mendahulu Negara Dalam Memperoleh Pelunasan Utang Pajak Dari Debitur Pailit. In Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan ke (Vol. 5).
Nurislamiati, & Citra, S. F. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Penerapan Hak Mendahulu Utang Pajak Dalam Perkara Kepailitan Pt Industries Badja Garuda Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Dharmasisya Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 37, 35. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisyaAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss3/35
Prasetyo, H. L., Ahmad, S., & Lutfi, A. (2024). Pengawasan KPPU Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Dalam Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Era Digital. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.646
Putra, S. C. K., & Joesoef, I. E. (2020). Hak Mendahului Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Dalam Memperoleh Pelunasan Utang Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Pt Internux. Procceding Conference National Conference on Law Studies: Legal Development Towards A Digital Society Era.
Putri, A. R., Machmud, A., & Sadino, S. (2025). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penolakan Tagihan Pajak dalam Proses Kepailitan PT Swissindo Marine. Binamulia Hukum, 14(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v14i1.942
Putri, Z. M., Panca, M., Mustaqim Sinaga, P., & Mbunai, L. O. (2025). Dualisme Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Mengenai Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum. In JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of Law (Vol. 2, Issue 1).
Rochmat, S. (1987). Asas dan Dasar Perpajakan. PT. Eresco.
Rochmat, Soemitro., & Dewi Kania, Sugiharti. (2004). Asas-Asas dan Dasar Perpajakan. Refika Aditama.
Sentosa, S. (2008). Hukum Dagang. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sheva Ardiansyah, R. (2024). Tinjauan Prinsip Efisiensi Terhadap Hak Mendahulu Negara Atas Piutang Pajak Dalam Kepailitan. Law And Taxation, 1(1).
Siahaan, A. L. S. (2016). Hak Mendahului Utang Pajak Oleh Wajib Pajak Yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Law Pro Justitia, 2(1), 71–75.
Siburian, R. Y., Susilowati, E., & Ispriyarso, B. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Pemulihan Hak Negara Atas Utang Pajak Perseroan Terbatas Pada Kepailitan. In DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL (Vol. 6, Issue 1).
Y Sri, Pudyatmoko. (2008). Pengantar Hukum Pajak (Edisi Revisi). Andi.
Zaeny, A. (2005). Hukum Bisnis Proses dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zahra Malinda Putri, Mhd Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga, La Ode Mbunai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

